The Washington Post announced today that it was folding its stand-alone book review section. Reviews will be folded into other sections of the paper.
This leaves two stand-alone book reviews in the U.S. -- the New York Times and the San Francisco Chronicle. Even though the new Chronicle editor John McMurtrie said recently that the paper's publisher was committed to a stand-alone review, one has to wonder if it can really continue. On the bright side, I have noticed more book advertising in the Chronicle.
The next few weeks will be revealing. The Chronicle will soon start using its new presses, which has already led to some changes. The Food and Home sections, for example, made their last Wednesday appearance today and from now on will appear in the Sunday paper. (I am personally disappointed by this development as I always looked forward to the Wednesday paper for its fabulous food section.)
That change may be a precursor to other changes.
While I am encouraged that the Washington Post will continue to actively review books, there is a difference between running a review on the front cover of a stand-alone book section and running on in the Style section. The first example makes a statement about a book's importance. The second just blends in with other cultural coverage.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(90)
-
►
October
(7)
- Andrew Sean Greer and the Art of Writing
- James Baldwin visits San Francisco in 1963 to expl...
- Surviving the Literay Death Match
- Literary Death Match -- May the most outrageous st...
- The Death of One Historian Leads Another to Doroth...
- The San Francisco Chronicle Changes its Bestseller...
- Towers of Gold Stage at Hardly Strictly Bluegrass ...
-
►
May
(9)
- Elaine and Bill Petrocelli of Book Passage Visit N...
- Writers at Work. Or is it Play?
- Why Does the Tale of the Donner Party Continue to ...
- E-Books, or Why Kemble Scott is Publishing his Sec...
- Bay Area Literary Tidbits
- Strange Upside to the Loss of 150 SF Chronicle Rep...
- How to Get Hired -- and Fired -- from the New York...
- Chronicle Lays Off More Reporters -- What Will Be ...
-
▼
January
(12)
- Another Book Review Bites the Dust
- Bay Area Literary Tidbits
- A Trip Back in San Francisco History
- Jews in El Paso
- Interview with John McMurtrie, Book Editor of the ...
- How A Book is Produced (NOT!)
- The Bestselling Books of 2008
- Random Thoughts and Notes
- Oh No! Stacey's Books to Close!
- Michael Chabon and Jon Carroll with a little Ayele...
- Literary Tidbits
- Foyle's War
-
►
October
(7)
3 comments:
It makes sense to put food and wine in the Sunday paper,. It's a good editorial fit -- more leisurely reading and when people have time to cook etc and they need to do something to beef up the Sunday paper. I don't read it anymore it's so dull.
You are probably right but I got a thrill each Wednesday anticipating the food section. I fear it will get lost in the Sunday paper. I feel there is more to read on Sunday and thus more competition.
I agree the Chron is getting so thin it's almost not worth buying it.
what about this a.m.'s new look-and-feel?? HATED the new serif font...if they wanted to go Gotham, shoulda used more of it...
not very "stay classy San Diego..."
Post a Comment